Large-scale Prosocial Persuasion: Large Language Models Outperform Humans in Personalized Fundraising Appeals

Two pre-registered online experiments (with a total of 1300 participants) found that fundraising appeals generated by large language models outperformed those written by humans in terms of donation amount, participation rate, and persuasion scores. Additionally, personalization enhanced effectiveness, while fake personalization had negative impacts, indicating that LLMs have the potential to become technical tools for promoting prosocial behavior.

Existing research mostly focuses on the risks of persuasive content generated by LLMs (e.g., misinformation spread), but this study focuses on their potential to promote prosocial behavior. The charity fundraising scenario was chosen to compare the persuasive differences between LLM-generated and human-written content, as well as the impact of personalization, through experiments.

Both experiments were pre-registered to ensure scientific rigor. Experiment 1 (658 participants) used a 2×3 design: content source (human/LLM) × personalization level (general/personalized/fake personalized); measurement indicators included donation amount, participation rate, and persuasion scores. Experiment 2 (642 participants) repeated the validation and deepened the research on the effect of personalization.

1. LLM-generated content significantly outperformed human-written content in donation amount, participation rate, and persuasion scores; 2. Authentic personalization enhanced effectiveness (requiring value/interest matching); 3. Fake personalization led to a decrease in trust and responsiveness.

1. Language optimization: Massive training enables LLMs to skillfully use emotional resonance and calls to action; 2. Consistency: Avoiding quality fluctuations in human-written content; 3. Large-scale personalization: Quickly analyzing user data to achieve efficient customization.

Positive potential: Promoting prosocial behaviors such as charity, public health, and environmental protection; Concerns: The technology may be abused for manipulation; Recommendations: Transparency should be maintained when using AI-generated content, and fake personalization should be avoided to prevent damage to credibility.

Limitations: Artificially controlled experimental scenarios, coverage limited to fundraising scenarios, no exploration of population differences; Future directions: Validation in real-world scenarios, cross-scenario expansion, research on population response differences, and design of ethical frameworks.

This study proves that LLMs can be used to promote prosocial behaviors, providing practical strategies for charitable organizations (e.g., LLM-generated personalized content); it emphasizes the need for joint efforts to ensure that AI capabilities are used for human well-being rather than harming social interests.