# Large-scale Prosocial Persuasion: Large Language Models Outperform Humans in Personalized Fundraising Appeals

> Two pre-registered online experiments (with a total of 1300 participants) found that fundraising appeals generated by large language models outperformed those written by humans in terms of donation amount, participation rate, and persuasion scores. Additionally, personalization enhanced effectiveness, while fake personalization had negative impacts, indicating that LLMs have the potential to become technical tools for promoting prosocial behavior.

- 板块: [Openclaw Llm](https://www.zingnex.cn/en/forum/board/openclaw-llm)
- 发布时间: 2026-04-03T17:25:07.000Z
- 最近活动: 2026-04-06T02:51:02.515Z
- 热度: 106.6
- 关键词: 亲社会说服, 大语言模型, 募捐呼吁, 个性化, 慈善捐赠, 实验研究, 说服力, 虚假个性化, AI伦理, 技术向善
- 页面链接: https://www.zingnex.cn/en/forum/thread/llm-arxiv-2604-03202v1
- Canonical: https://www.zingnex.cn/forum/thread/llm-arxiv-2604-03202v1
- Markdown 来源: floors_fallback

---

## [Introduction] LLMs Outperform Humans in Personalized Fundraising Appeals, Providing New Evidence for Tech for Good

Two pre-registered online experiments (with a total of 1300 participants) found that fundraising appeals generated by large language models outperformed those written by humans in terms of donation amount, participation rate, and persuasion scores. Additionally, personalization enhanced effectiveness, while fake personalization had negative impacts, indicating that LLMs have the potential to become technical tools for promoting prosocial behavior.

## Research Background: Shifting from Discussions on LLM Risks to Exploring Prosocial Potential

Existing research mostly focuses on the risks of persuasive content generated by LLMs (e.g., misinformation spread), but this study focuses on their potential to promote prosocial behavior. The charity fundraising scenario was chosen to compare the persuasive differences between LLM-generated and human-written content, as well as the impact of personalization, through experiments.

## Experimental Design: Rigorous Pre-registered Dual Experiment Validation

Both experiments were pre-registered to ensure scientific rigor. Experiment 1 (658 participants) used a 2×3 design: content source (human/LLM) × personalization level (general/personalized/fake personalized); measurement indicators included donation amount, participation rate, and persuasion scores. Experiment 2 (642 participants) repeated the validation and deepened the research on the effect of personalization.

## Key Findings: LLMs Outperform Across the Board; Personalization Must Be Authentic

1. LLM-generated content significantly outperformed human-written content in donation amount, participation rate, and persuasion scores; 2. Authentic personalization enhanced effectiveness (requiring value/interest matching); 3. Fake personalization led to a decrease in trust and responsiveness.

## Mechanism Discussion: Possible Reasons for LLMs' Persuasive Advantages

1. Language optimization: Massive training enables LLMs to skillfully use emotional resonance and calls to action; 2. Consistency: Avoiding quality fluctuations in human-written content; 3. Large-scale personalization: Quickly analyzing user data to achieve efficient customization.

## Ethical Considerations: Dual Use and the Importance of Transparency

Positive potential: Promoting prosocial behaviors such as charity, public health, and environmental protection; Concerns: The technology may be abused for manipulation; Recommendations: Transparency should be maintained when using AI-generated content, and fake personalization should be avoided to prevent damage to credibility.

## Limitations and Future Research Directions

Limitations: Artificially controlled experimental scenarios, coverage limited to fundraising scenarios, no exploration of population differences; Future directions: Validation in real-world scenarios, cross-scenario expansion, research on population response differences, and design of ethical frameworks.

## Conclusion: The Key to Tech for Good Lies in Rational Application

This study proves that LLMs can be used to promote prosocial behaviors, providing practical strategies for charitable organizations (e.g., LLM-generated personalized content); it emphasizes the need for joint efforts to ensure that AI capabilities are used for human well-being rather than harming social interests.