Comprehensive Analysis of Reasoning Data: How to Build High-Quality Reasoning Datasets in the Post-Training Phase

This is a systematic review paper that synthesizes over 150 studies on post-training reasoning data, providing a comprehensive theoretical framework for the data engineering of reasoning models from four dimensions: data objects, quality factors, construction methods, and scale effects. The paper is from arXiv, published on June 1, 2026, titled "A Primer in Post-Training Reasoning Data: What We Know About How It Works" (link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02113v1).

In recent years, large language models (such as OpenAI o1, DeepSeek R1) have made breakthroughs in reasoning capabilities, and the post-training phase is key—unlike pre-training which focuses on language pattern learning, post-training concentrates on chain-of-thought formation, strategy optimization, and self-correction. However, research related to reasoning data is scattered across multiple fields such as datasets, reinforcement learning, and reward models, lacking systematic guidance, so this review is of great significance.

Data Objects: Reasoning data includes question-answer pairs (with detailed reasoning processes), chains of thought (intermediate steps + annotations + verification nodes), and multiple reasoning paths (correct/incorrect/alternative paths); types cover mathematics, code, science, common sense, multi-step reasoning, etc. Quality Factors: Correctness (accurate answers, rigorous reasoning logic), diversity (variety of questions/solutions), difficulty adaptation (matching model capabilities), and clear formatting (consistent annotations, readability).

High-quality reasoning data construction methods include:

• Manual Construction: Expert annotation (high quality but high cost), crowdsourcing annotation (low cost but requires quality control);
• Automatic Construction: Model generation (bootstrapping, iterative refinement), formal system conversion (program trajectories, proof steps);
• Hybrid Methods: Human-machine collaboration (model generation + manual verification), adversarial generation (generator-discriminator optimization).

There is a diminishing returns phenomenon between the scale of reasoning data and model performance: initial small-scale data brings significant improvements, but subsequent marginal returns decrease, and simply increasing quantity easily hits a quality bottleneck. It is necessary to balance quality and quantity, prioritizing cleaning low-quality samples. Strategies to improve data efficiency include curriculum learning (from easy to difficult), active learning (selecting the most valuable samples), and programmatic generation (templating/parameterization), etc.

The four-dimensional framework proposed in the paper provides a common language, evaluation criteria, research directions, and practical guidance.

• Researchers: Use the framework to conduct systematic research, report data details in detail, and open-source datasets;
• Industry: Emphasize investment in high-quality data, build proprietary data, and iterate continuously;
• Educators: Apply reasoning data to improve AI education and cultivate problem-solving abilities.

Future research needs to explore:

• Theoretical Understanding: The nature of reasoning, generalization mechanisms, emergence conditions;
• Data Engineering: Optimal data distribution, automatic quality assessment, cross-domain transfer;
• Methodological Innovation: New data types, efficient generation/verification technologies.