Think Like a Human Painter: A Four-Step Creation Method for Process-Driven Image Generation

This article proposes a new paradigm called process-driven image generation, which aims to enable AI to complete creation through four iterative steps—text planning, visual drafting, text reflection, and visual refinement—just like human painters. This method addresses the problem of traditional AI image generation's 'one-step' approach that lacks dynamic thinking, allowing AI to possess a human-like creative thinking that interweaves 'thinking' and 'action'.

When creating, human painters go through an iterative process of conception → drafting → reflection → refinement. However, current mainstream AI image generation models (such as diffusion and autoregressive models) mostly adopt a 'one-step' strategy, lacking this dynamic thinking. This raises a core question: Can unified multimodal models imagine a series of intermediate states during the generation process like humans do?

Process-driven image generation breaks down creation into four alternating stages:

1. Text Planning: Generate specific, executable visual instructions (e.g., "Place a snow mountain in the center of the image with a cold color tone");
2. Visual Drafting: Generate rough but clearly laid-out intermediate states based on the plan;
3. Text Reflection: Evaluate the draft and propose revision suggestions (e.g., "The outline of the snow mountain needs stronger contrast");
4. Visual Refinement: Adjust the image according to the reflection, looping until satisfied.

The core challenge of process-driven generation is how to evaluate 'unfinished' intermediate states. The research team addresses this through dense step-by-step supervision:

• Visual Constraints: Spatial consistency (e.g., reasonable reflection positions), semantic consistency (elements match text descriptions);
• Text Constraints: Preserve prior visual knowledge, identify and correct inconsistencies with the original prompt.

Training Strategy: Build a process-supervised dataset containing intermediate states, and perform multi-objective optimization on text reasoning and visual generation modules; Experimental Validation: Compared to one-time generation, this method shows significant improvements in image quality (better semantic alignment), controllability (users can intervene and modify), diversity (different creation paths), and robustness (more stable handling of complex prompts).

Process-driven generation has broad application prospects:

• Interactive Creation: Users can refine their intent through multi-round dialogue;
• Educational Assistance: Display the complete creation process to help learn artistic skills;
• Design Iteration: Quickly explore design schemes to improve efficiency;
• Content Review: Explicit intermediate states make compliance checks easier.

The current method has limitations: high computational overhead, large demand for training data, and difficulty handling long-range dependencies. Future directions include: optimizing efficiency (low-resolution iteration, adaptive termination), reducing data costs (semi-/self-supervision), improving memory mechanisms, and expanding to video/3D/music and other fields.

Process-driven image generation achieves a paradigm shift from 'letting AI generate images' to 'letting AI learn to create'. It enables AI to have the ability to plan, reflect, and improve. Although there is still a gap from the creativity and emotion of human artists, it opens up a new direction for AI creation.