Zing Forum

Reading

Intelligent Medical Diagnosis Support System Based on Large Language Models and RAG

A study on an intelligent medical diagnosis support system combining large language models (LLMs) and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) technology, exploring the application potential and technical implementation of LLMs in the field of medical auxiliary diagnosis.

医疗AIRAG大语言模型临床决策支持智能诊断医学知识库检索增强生成CDSS医疗信息化
Published 2026-06-13 22:38Recent activity 2026-06-13 23:04Estimated read 5 min
Intelligent Medical Diagnosis Support System Based on Large Language Models and RAG
1

Section 01

Introduction: Core Overview of the Intelligent Medical Diagnosis Support System Based on LLM and RAG

Original Author and Source

This study constructs an intelligent medical diagnosis support system based on large language models (LLMs) and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) technology, addressing issues such as high maintenance costs of traditional Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) and knowledge hallucinations in LLMs. The system enhances generation through retrieval from external medical knowledge bases, improving diagnostic accuracy and interpretability. Experiments show that compared to the pure LLM baseline, the accuracy on MedQA increased by 13% and the hallucination rate decreased by 12%.

2

Section 02

Background: Needs and Challenges of Intelligent Medical Diagnosis

Medical diagnosis relies on professional knowledge and experience, but doctors are prone to cognitive biases. The explosive growth of medical knowledge makes traditional CDSS (rule-based engines) difficult to adapt. Although LLMs have potential, they face challenges such as knowledge hallucinations, poor timeliness, and lack of interpretability, requiring reliable technical solutions.

3

Section 03

Methodology: Architecture Design of RAG-Driven Diagnosis Support System

Advantages of RAG Architecture

  • Knowledge Updatable: Independently maintain medical knowledge bases
  • Reduce Hallucinations: Generate based on real literature
  • Interpretability: Display original literature sources

Core Modules

  • Knowledge Base: Integrate guidelines, cases, knowledge graphs, mixed storage (vector database/graph database/document library)
  • Retrieval: Multi-path recall (semantic/keyword/graph) + re-ranking (cross-encoder/time decay)
  • Generation: Structured prompt, output diagnosis list + evidence + examination suggestions + references
  • Safety: Disclaimer, confidence threshold, sensitive content filtering
4

Section 04

Evidence: System Evaluation Methods and Experimental Results

Evaluation Datasets

  • MedQA (USMLE multiple-choice questions), PubMedQA (Q&A), self-built clinical cases

Key Results

  • MedQA Accuracy: 65%→78%
  • Hallucination Rate:15%→3%
  • Expert Score:3.2/5→4.1/5
  • Medical-specific encoder outperforms general encoder by 8 percentage points
5

Section 05

Conclusion: Value and Significance of the System

This system represents an important direction for AI-assisted healthcare, combining the language capabilities of LLMs with structured knowledge bases to provide interpretable recommendations. Although it cannot replace doctors, as an intelligent assistant, it has demonstrated value in improving efficiency, reducing knowledge gaps, and promoting evidence-based practice, with expectations for future clinical applications.

6

Section 06

Recommendations: Application Scenarios, Deployment Considerations, and Future Directions

Application Scenarios

  • Outpatient Pre-diagnosis: Preliminary diagnosis suggestions
  • Difficult Cases: Differential diagnosis ideas
  • Medical Education: Clinical thinking practice

Deployment Challenges

  • Privacy: Desensitization/local deployment/compliance
  • Regulation: Clinical validation/auxiliary positioning/manual review

Future Directions

  • Multimodal fusion (imaging/laboratory data)
  • Personalized adaptation (patient medical history/preferences)
  • Continuous learning (doctor feedback/knowledge updates)