Beyond Semantics: A Multi-Perspective Learning Framework Based on Evidential Reasoning for Trustworthy Mental Health Prediction

This paper proposes a multi-perspective learning framework that integrates semantic representations from encoders and reasoning information from decoders, combined with subjective logic evidential learning to achieve explicit uncertainty modeling. The framework verifies its prediction accuracy and robustness on three real-world datasets: Dreaddit, SDCNL, and DepSeverity, providing a trustworthy AI solution for high-risk mental health assessment scenarios.

Although automated mental health prediction using text data has made progress, deploying it in high-risk scenarios faces challenges: over-reliance on semantic representations while ignoring high-level reasoning information; prone to overconfident predictions under ambiguous/noisy data; lack of reliable uncertainty estimation mechanisms, which undermines user trust. Incorrect predictions may lead to serious consequences, making the construction of a 'trustworthy' system an urgent task.

Define mental health prediction as a multi-perspective learning problem, integrating two types of complementary information:

• Semantic Perspective: Semantic representations from encoder models (e.g., BERT), which excel at capturing lexical and syntactic patterns and mental health-related language markers;
• Reasoning Perspective: High-level reasoning information from decoder models (e.g., GPT), which identifies implicit causal logic and contextual clues. Design Insight: Mental health status is reflected not only in literal words but also in narrative logical structures, emotional reasoning chains, and cognitive patterns.

Adopt the subjective logic framework to implement uncertainty modeling, outputting subjective opinions including belief mass, uncertainty mass, and base rate, which clearly distinguish between confident, uncertain, and ignorant states. Evidence Fusion Strategy: Adaptively adjust the weight of each perspective; the contribution of perspectives with low evidence quality is automatically discounted to ensure the robustness of the fusion result.

Verified on three real-world datasets:

• Dreaddit (anxiety detection): accuracy 0.835;
• SDCNL (suicide risk detection): accuracy 0.731;
• DepSeverity (depression severity assessment): accuracy 0.751. Noise robustness experiments show that the system's performance is stable under data interference, and uncertainty estimation can reflect the decline in data quality. Case studies demonstrate interpretable reasoning signals, helping humans understand the basis for decisions.

1. Paradigm Shift: From pure performance orientation to trustworthy AI orientation, incorporating uncertainty quantification into the core;
2. Multi-Perspective Complementarity: Combine the advantages of encoders (local semantics) and decoders (global reasoning) to avoid the limitations of a single perspective;
3. Evidence Theory Integration: End-to-end learnable evidence fusion mechanism, enabling seamless integration of subjective logic and deep learning.

Application Potential: As a clinical auxiliary tool, mark high-risk cases for professional assessment and actively seek human intervention when uncertain; Ethical Boundaries: AI should not replace professional medical diagnosis; its value lies in improving screening efficiency and coverage, and human-machine collaboration is a responsible deployment method.