The Limits of Chameleons: Personality Collapse and Homogenization in Large Language Models

This article focuses on the phenomenon of "personality collapse" in large language models (LLMs): even when unique role settings are assigned to agents, their behaviors still converge to narrow patterns. The study found a counterintuitive rule—models that simulate individual roles most accurately often exhibit the most severe stereotyping at the group level. This phenomenon poses challenges to applications relying on diversity, such as multi-agent simulation and synthetic data generation.

Personality collapse refers to the convergence of behaviors of multiple LLM agents to similar patterns under different role settings, where group diversity is far lower than expected. This is a fatal issue for scenarios such as multi-agent social simulation (requiring real behavior distribution), synthetic data generation (affecting downstream model generalization), and role-playing games (where user experience core lies in differentiation), as it undermines the foundation of these applications.

Researchers propose a three-dimensional framework to measure the degree of collapse:

1. Coverage: The proportion of the role-set behavior space actually covered by the model group;
2. Uniformity: Whether the distribution of agents in the behavior space is uniform;
3. Complexity: Whether the behavior patterns have multi-level and multi-dimensional characteristics. These dimensions together form a three-dimensional evaluation perspective, requiring a comprehensive judgment of model diversity.

Research reveals the prevalent phenomenon of "personality collapse" in large language models (LLMs): even when distinct role settings are assigned to each agent, their behaviors still converge to narrow patterns. Counterintuitively, models that simulate individual roles most accurately often exhibit the most severe stereotyping at the group level.