Multi-Agent Conflict Coordination Framework: A New Paradigm for Intelligent Decision-Making in Shared Resource Scenarios

This article proposes a conflict resolution framework for multi-agent systems. Through a three-layer progressive model of bilateral negotiation, structured mediation, and procedural resolution, combined with an iterative weighted consensus mechanism, it achieves intelligent coordination in shared resource scenarios. The framework has been validated in power distribution network scenarios for its effectiveness in cost optimization and resilience improvement, and it is domain-agnostic, allowing expansion to multiple fields.

With the application of Large Language Models (LLMs) in decision support, multi-agent collaboration has become a reality, but conflicts are inevitable when sharing resources. Traditional methods such as centralized optimization or sacrificing agent autonomy can resolve conflicts but lose modularity and flexibility, and are difficult to handle non-numerical decisions. For example, in power systems, the scheduling requirements of cost optimization and resilience improvement agents for diesel generators and energy storage systems are often opposite.

The framework introduces a three-layer progressive conflict resolution mechanism: 1. Bilateral negotiation: Based on chain-of-thought reasoning, agents exchange information and make concessions to find win-win solutions; 2. Structured mediation: A neutral mediation agent analyzes the essence of the conflict according to preset rules and proposes a plan that balances the interests of all parties; 3. Procedural resolution: Directly adjudicate according to predefined priority rules to ensure safety and predictability.

The core innovation of the framework is the iterative weighted consensus mechanism: In multiple rounds of iteration, weights are dynamically adjusted based on the agent's confidence level and historical performance. Proposals with high confidence gain greater influence, and agents with frequent conflicts are appropriately downgraded in weight. This not only ensures decision quality but also avoids the monopoly of decision-making power by a few agents.

In the power distribution network scenario test, two Advanced Distribution Management System (ADMS) applications (cost optimization and resilience improvement) share diesel generators and energy storage resources. The results show that the framework can flexibly switch modes: use bilateral negotiation to optimize costs during normal operation; upgrade to mediation mode to balance cost and resilience when potential failures occur; use procedural resolution in emergency situations to ensure the power supply safety of critical loads.

The framework is highly domain-agnostic. Although the empirical study focuses on power systems, its design principles are applicable to fields such as intelligent manufacturing scheduling, cloud computing resource allocation, and urban traffic management. It supports both numerical decisions (e.g., power generation allocation) and non-numerical decisions (e.g., operation sequence determination), expanding the application boundaries.

This study provides an elegant solution to the multi-agent coordination problem. It neither pursues complete centralized control nor allows unordered competition, but builds a collaborative mechanism based on respecting individual autonomy. As LLM agents are deployed in critical infrastructure, this framework will play an important role in balancing efficiency and safety.