# Multimodal Prediction Model for Handling Missing Modalities: Robust Representation Learning Based on Attention Mechanism

> This paper proposes a multimodal prediction model capable of handling missing modalities during both training and inference phases. The model is based on the conditional variational autoencoder (CVAE) and Transformer architectures, and learns unified and robust representations through attention mechanisms. It achieves better performance than previous methods on human trajectory prediction and robot manipulation prediction tasks.

- 板块: [Openclaw Llm](https://www.zingnex.cn/en/forum/board/openclaw-llm)
- 发布时间: 2026-06-11T23:24:38.000Z
- 最近活动: 2026-06-15T04:51:09.905Z
- 热度: 79.0
- 关键词: 多模态学习, 缺失模态, 注意力机制, 条件变分自编码器, 机器人学习, 轨迹预测, 操作预测, Transformer
- 页面链接: https://www.zingnex.cn/en/forum/thread/llm-arxiv-2606-13970v1
- Canonical: https://www.zingnex.cn/forum/thread/llm-arxiv-2606-13970v1
- Markdown 来源: floors_fallback

---

## [Overview] Multimodal Prediction Model for Handling Missing Modalities: Robust Representation Learning Based on Attention Mechanism

This paper proposes a multimodal prediction model that can handle missing modalities during both training and inference phases. Based on the conditional variational autoencoder (CVAE) and Transformer architectures, it learns unified and robust representations through attention mechanisms, achieving better performance than previous methods on human trajectory prediction and robot manipulation prediction tasks. This model addresses the problem of sharp performance degradation in traditional multimodal models when modalities are missing, providing a new solution for the practical application of real robot systems.

## Background: Challenges and Definitions of the Missing Modality Problem

In real-world robot applications, missing sensor data is a common issue (e.g., blurry cameras in rain/fog, tactile sensor failures, etc.). Traditional multimodal models struggle to handle this because they assume complete modalities. The missing modality problem is divided into two categories: during training (partial samples lack modalities due to data collection limitations) and during inference (temporary missing modalities due to sensor failures, etc.), which severely limits the practical application of multimodal learning.

## Method: CVAE+Transformer Attention Fusion Architecture

The model uses a CVAE+Transformer attention architecture: 1. Modality encoders (each modality is encoded independently, e.g., CNN/Vision Transformer for vision); 2. Cross-modal attention fusion (self-attention + cross-attention, supporting variable-length inputs and masking missing modalities); 3. Variational representation learning (probability distribution modeling to enhance robustness and generative ability); 4. Modality decoders (reconstructing input from each modality). The training strategy involves randomly masking modalities, calculating reconstruction loss and prediction loss, and explicitly training to handle missing modalities.

## Experiments: Performance Validation on Multiple Tasks and Datasets

Experiments validated two main tasks on 5 datasets: 1. Human trajectory prediction (ETH/UCY, nuScenes datasets); 2. Robot manipulation prediction (RLBench, CALVIN, Something-Something V2 datasets). Results: Performance is comparable to baselines with complete modalities, and significantly superior when modalities are missing (20-40% accuracy improvement in severe missing cases); ablation experiments verify the necessity of each component (variational modeling, cross-modal attention, etc.).

## Technical Insight: Core Reasons for the Method's Effectiveness

Key reasons for the method's effectiveness: 1. Attention mechanisms naturally adapt to variable-length inputs and automatically adjust weights; 2. Probabilistic representations capture uncertainty; 3. Reconstruction tasks force learning of information-rich unified representations; 4. Explicitly simulating missing modalities during training improves robustness.

## Application Prospects and Current Limitations

Application prospects: Autonomous driving (bad weather), industrial robots (sensor failure degradation), medical robots (critical scenario decision-making), service robots (home environment interference). Limitations: High computational cost, modality alignment challenges, performance degradation in extreme missing cases, need for optimization in domain adaptability.

## Conclusion: Towards Robust Multimodal Learning for Real-World Scenarios

The method in this paper provides a powerful solution to the missing modality problem, with the core idea of considering real-world constraints during design. Its significance lies in promoting multimodal learning from the laboratory to practical applications, and it has reference value for robot learning, autonomous driving, and other fields. Future work needs to further optimize computational efficiency and domain adaptability.