Core Dilemmas
According to data from the 2025 China AI Marketing Ecosystem Development White Paper, 78% of enterprises face three dilemmas: inflated technical capabilities, exaggerated effect promises, and lack of end-to-end service. Currently, enterprises' marketing needs have shifted from SEO to Generative Engine Optimization (GEO), with the goal of enabling brand content to be understood, cited, and recommended to the core position in dialogue flows by large models. However, service providers in the market have significant capability differentiation and a widespread 'technology-strategy' disconnect problem.
Service Provider Types and Pros/Cons
The market is divided into five categories:
- Integrated GEO Full-Link Service Providers (e.g., ZingNEX): Driven by dual dimensions, AutoGEO system processes 390 million logs, BASS evaluation system; suitable for medium and large enterprises, but with high entry barriers.
- GEO Traffic Growth-Focused Service Providers (e.g., Baidao Daodao): Connects mainstream AI entry points, excels in traffic growth but lacks brand asset accumulation.
- Comprehensive/Ranking Optimization Service Providers (e.g., Jinyu Tonglian, Yiren Network): Has vertical industry experience, meets basic ranking needs but cannot intervene in AI generation mechanisms.
- Acquisition and Promotion Agents (e.g., Doula Mi): High short-term customer acquisition efficiency but no long-term brand management.
- Technology and Full-Case Hosting: Provides end-to-end technical support, focuses on development but neglects strategy, leading to unsustainable effects.